Concluding Statement of Christian Haslebacher
You have asked me after my last statement to come to my final statement. You throw me in your reply # 5 is an oblique hermeneutics before, the giants of Scripture violence and bending, to make the Scriptures for their own ideas available. True to this statement is that the so-called women's issues will decide in the field of hermeneutics. The handling of Paul with the Holy Scriptures is a very important point. My mistake in my answer # 5 was likely that I have referred only to places where Paul, in my view, relatively "free" deals with the Old Testament. This was probably a one-sided picture of my understanding given. I have twice in this context said that Paul had "changed" the meaning of the Old Testament text. I would have "added" correct have said that. However, I believe, however, that dealing with historical events of Paul in the Old Testament is more complex than that he just always set out the intended meaning of God universally. This includes the so-called reflection citations from the Gospel of Matthew. Here I would suggest you up again objectively delve into this subject matter dealing with the OT in the NT.
make it clear I would like that I made in my comments any statements regarding homosexuality and that this issue not as I see it as you might fear. I am convinced that one can not justify a liberal view of homosexuality in with "my" Hermeneutics can. If you believe that, you have my "Hermeneutics is not understood.
short some remarks on the so-called meta-level: I have criticized you in the debate never, you are the Holy Scriptures disobedient, you wanted to justify your interpretation only at your own practice and what would the testimony of the Scriptures bend to them usable for your beliefs to make. You have repeatedly accused me these things, however, implicitly and explicitly, and I titled before the debate as evangelical feminists who read the Bible biased feminist. So you have tucked me from the beginning in a drawer and will now probably your expectation (or your prejudices) confirmed and view argue that the debate had even confirmed that I belong in this drawer. The question is simply whether you under those circumstances would have ever had the inner resolve to get something substantial. A learning attitude are well known, silence and submission times and the question: "What is evidence that the other has right and I'm wrong?". Moreover, I would have the above things can also blame, but what I did not realize, because I think first of their nature or beneficial and would secondly learn from you.
If you're interested: My wife is not a feminist, she does not preach and they is not in church leadership. Churchill once said: "Some people change their principles to suit their party and some people change their party to suit their principles ." In this sense, my Employers Association of Municipalities for me is not decisive on this issue. I am assuming that the latter applies to you. Although
me your argument in this matter, which one can ultimately only with yes or no answer, could not change his mind, I have learned a lot from you, for which I am grateful to you.
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment