It's more than irony . The fundamental criticism Karl Popper at the time of the Marxist philosophy of history - which he rightly or wrongly, as "historicism " constructed - was bestowed, can effectively exercise of basic beliefs of U.S. hegemony.
first Globalization and free trade, promote mutual benefits (win-win situation for the trade partners).
second Economic development and democratization of a country go hand in hand.
third Globalization is equal to Americanization, thus encouraging the enforcement of American values.
4th Democratic countries have no fundamental conflicts of interest, therefore, all democratic countries of the leadership U.S. opposed.
Gideon Rachman: Think Again: American Decline . Foreign Policy, Jan. / Feb. 2011th
under such world-historical prejudices that often no longer be made aware of, is the theory of "industrial society" and the "modernization". Especially the case of China shows that behind this supposedly scientific sociology is nothing more than an ideology hides, which assumes the special case of the USA as a general binding model of social development. A theoretical set piece, which is often intertwined with other theories of globalism .
Karl Marx used already in the preface to Capital, a comparatively simplification, when he wrote that England was the model for the following countries for industrial development. The error is only unilinear developments and mono-causal, or at least to think only of few reasons reasons.
0 comments:
Post a Comment