The Wikileaks -founder Julian Assange enjoys the sympathy of the majority, even if he is more explosive with his operations to locate and release moves truths often in the gray area of legality. In a survey of the site of the (CH), visitors from certain evening news about how they relate to the actions of Wikileaks.
There were three options for answers given:
a) We like it when David fought Goliath
b) We love nothing more than the truth
c) We want outsiders to be punished
b) was clearly in the lead - 56% chose this option. The result is both surprising, not the other.
Not surprisingly it is when we are behind the direct statement: "We love nothing more than the truth" look. It has always been welcome, if someone from the machinations of some powerful institutions, which we are delivered partly, or acting threatening or frightening, brought to light. That is why conspiracy theories are popular, whether they are true or not. About Mighty churches or sects that enslave their followers, states / governments, abusing their authority to freely to do wrong, mega-corporations, which means their financial resources circumnavigate the law, etc. .. If these things come to light, we are happy and feel safe, because who knows if it can not meet him once when he gets one of those in power in the way?
does surprise the statement of the majority that "we love nothing more than the truth" when we take the sentence literally and apply it to every situation and each person applying (including ourselves).
we love for the truth when it is detrimental to us?
Yes, we condemn those whose 'truth' by Wikileaks is dragged into the light. We rightly condemn that prevent them want their dark machinations come to the surface.
But what does it look if someone wants to pull our most secret things to light? If things we have done for us, we feel ashamed actually (should) should be made known?
example, if it should be known that I hate my staff that I vorheuchle loyalty, actually ... come out if, should I have cheated on my wife, my husband (perhaps only in thought, or through employment with pornography, or even in fact) ... if people should learn that I had spread false things about others, or that I had stolen someone something (And if the only time that I 'make blue' by the boss had stolen ).... and so on.
All these things we may not look as bad. We can rightly lay justifications for it. But if we imagine that we would be drawn to the public and put down and it would mean: ". This is the one who has done the do /"
Would we then also say that we love nothing more than the truth?
No, I do not think so. We would be the one who brings these truths to light about us to hate the way the climate liar and hate the Americans Julian Assange!
why people really hate the truth. Above all, the truth, published by God in the Bible about it. That is why they hate God and his messengers. Because no one loves the truth, which places him in a bad light - even if it's the truth.
But actually we should love the truth really is. For the truth, published by the God above us in the Bible is not to destroy us. But it wants to call us to repentance. And she wants to show us the man who came to wanted all the shameful things that we thought, and have done so to forgive.
There is a divine Wikileaks, which is brought up after our death. Then indeed all come to light what we previously held in secret have.
Blessed is he who faces the uncomfortable truth earlier, admits that he has (in all points) against God's law (read in 2.Mose 20) failed and offered general amnesty to persons which is offered to him if he confesses. The Bible expresses the
this:
When we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness . (1 Jn 1:8-9)
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment