U.S. president to be seen with the Republicans, who have won the last election the upper hand? Following a strategic realignment, he will reorganize his political advisers. He wants to learn from his predecessors in office, but without Bill Clinton's attempts to copy way. In particular, " triangulation" approach is a Clinton, Obama did not fit into the concept.
"Despite all his time studying the Clinton administration, Mr. Obama told his aides that he had no intention of following the precise path of Mr. Clinton, who after the Democratic midterm election defeats of 1994 ordered a clearing of the decks inside the White House, installed competing teams of advisers and employed a centrist policy of triangulation. In fact, several advisers confirmed, the word “triangulation” has been banned by Mr. Obama because he does not believe it accurately describes his approach."
JEFF ZELENY: Obama Is Set to Shuffle His Staff . NYT, 23.12.2010.
Was versteht man indes unter " triangulation " innerhalb der US-amerikanischen Politik?
" Triangulation is the name given to the act of a political candidate presenting his or her ideology as being "above" and "between" the "left" and "right" sides (or "wings") of a traditional (e.g. UK or US) democratic "political spectrum". It involves adopting for oneself some of the ideas of one's political opponent (or apparent opponent). The logic behind it is that it both takes credit for the opponent's ideas, and insulates the triangulator from attacks on that particular issue. Opponents of triangulation[who?], who believe in a fundamental "left" and "right", consider the dynamic a deviation from its "reality" and dismiss those that strive for it as whimsical."
Derlei Versuche, über den politischen und idelogischen Fronten zu stehen, hat already taken place earlier. Proudhon's Philosophy of Poverty was such an attempt to mediate between the bourgeois political economy and communism. Marx has shown in his refutation Proudhon an impassable method.
"In a dialectical sequence understands Proudhon an array of economic categories (which he also" machines "sums up what Marx rejected as uneconomic stars [6]), with a good side of a bad side contradicts and ultimately both are reconciled in a synthesis . This is for neither Marx (Hegelian) dialectic, nor a satisfactory approach because instead of a statement only moral judgments come into play "in Marx's original
Or:
." Proudhon, the dialectic of Hegel subjects when he applied to the political economy.
For M. Proudhon, every economic category, two sides, good and bad. He regarded the categories as the petty bourgeois regarded the great men of history: Napoleon was a great man, he has done many good things he has done so many bad things.
The good side and bad side, the advantage and disadvantage of the combined form for M. Proudhon the contradiction in every economic category.
problem to solve: Keep the good side and eliminate the bad "
. [Marx: The Poverty of Philosophy, p. 160 Digital Library Volume 11: Marx and Engels, p. 2467 (see MEW vol 4, p. 131)]
The term "triangulation" has recently been placed in the methodology of empirical sciences a certain career.
triangulation is a research strategy in empirical social research, be used in various methods or ways of seeing the same phenomenon or are different types of data for the study of a phenomenon used to the strengths of each one approach, the weaknesses of each other in balance. The aim is usually to achieve a higher validity of research results and to reduce systematic errors.
One could see from this that "triangulation" a continuation of ideas and methodological considerations that were discussed at weddings of critical rationalism as theory pluralism and pluralism of methods.
0 comments:
Post a Comment