Women Whipping Scenes In Film

5) Which method should be compared?



After answering the question (3) with respect to the criteria of theory assessment for selected according to meta-theoretical paradigm different evaluation criteria are selected, we will therefore apply in accordance with the chosen metatheory a peculiar method of how we organize the theory compared effectively and perform

Just as it is none the less legitimate to design paradigm comprehensive evaluation criteria, one can take the test, a possible universal developing method.

below are a few indications this would be to:

1) The multi-paradigmatic structure of the metatheory and the theories within the social sciences in our time should be worked out as a correspondingly wide variety of available theoretical and metatheoretical Options that present themselves as reference points of self-and mutual criticism.

2) This involves the selection, identification and development of a specific meta-theory and two specific theories and theoretical approaches on the basis of the same.

3) The development of the chosen meta-theory must also be the explication of the criteria of theory evaluation, and include

fourth) of the process that will decide in which of the acceptance of a theory.

5) T and T 'must be reconstructed, that the theory elements supported under the Linderberg / Wippler model with different logical functions account is.

6) There must be rules for translation T 'to T and vice versa to be developed. to translate into a supposedly "independent approach" language, as proposed by Matthes (1978, p. 15) appears, however hopeless. For such a medium does not exist. The "asymmetric" translatability is the only open road that continues.

7) can be applied equally to both the criteria of (3) and

8) the decision procedure according to (4) After production of the "commensurability" between T and T 'according to the translation supplied.

9) Finally, heuristic Methods used, such as the modification of the independent and dependent variables of T and T '(see Opp 1978, p. 216 ff) to the quintessence of step (7) and (8) T progressively transform.

Matthes (1978, p. 16) rightly criticizes certainly that often, hypotheses and concepts that could translate not assimilate of T 'in T and lightly discarded as useless.

A progressive strategy would include T to alter the extent that a translation as possible of all elements of T may instead have '.

---
literature

Giesen and Schmid 1978: Bernard Giesen, Michael Schmid, Methodological models and sociological theories , in: Hondrich / Matthes 1978, p. 232-254.

Hondrich / Matthes 1978: Karl Otto Hondrich, Joachim Matthes (ed.), comparison theory in the social sciences , Darmstadt Neuwied 1978th

Lindenberg / Wippler 1978: Siegwart Lindenberg, Reinhard Wippler, comparison theory: elements of the reconstruction , in: Hondrich / Matthes 1978, p. 219-231.

Matthes 1978: Joachim Matthes, The discussion of the theory of comparison since the Kassel Sociological 1974, in: Hondrich / Matthes 1978, p. 7-20.

Opp 1978: Karl-Dieter Opp, problems and strategies of the theory of comparative , In: Hondrich / Matthes 1978, p. 213-218.

Spinner 1972: Helmut F. Spinner, pluralism as a model of knowledge , Frankfurt / M. 1974th

Wippler 1978: Reinhard Wippler, the explanatory theories The development of theoretical approaches, in: Hondrich / Matthes 1978, p. 196-212.

--- ---